On 3/14/07, Morgen Sagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, so it seems that moving to an "item soup" on the server has opened us up to a security loophole, and for preview perhaps we should just say that if an item is uploaded into two different collections, then the item is stored twice (as done in the past). That closes the loophole for this scenario: http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/cosmo-dev/2007-February/002870.html
i completely disagree with this conclusion. i don't have a counterproposal yet, but i will start thinking about it. maybe after i get done with the dozens of eim changes still in the queue. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
