I think there is an order of operations problem here.
If there are bugs which have UI that is not specced out, the
developers should talk to PPD first, so that there is less chance of
having to re-do the work.
Secondly, I agree that PPD should review stuff, but it is sort of
annoying to have to manually re-assign stuff to PPD after each bug
fix. Is there a way to add this into the bugzilla workflow, so that
it goes
ASSIGNED --> FIXED --> UI-VERIFIED --> VERIFIED
If not, we can adapt. Just trying to keep the process as light as
possible.
On Apr 9, 2007, at 4:43 PM, Ted Leung wrote:
+1. Assigning the bug to a designer seems like the best way to
ensure that things get looked at, since we use the bug lists to
monitor the status of a release.
Ted
On Apr 9, 2007, at 9:57 AM, Priscilla Chung wrote:
I'd like to propose as part of the process, when there are bugs
which impact the user and may not have been completely spec-ed out
yet, I'd like to encourage developers to send an e-mail to the
design list or reassign the bug back to UI design so that we can
review it before marking the bug fixed?
Does anyone have any objections or a better suggestion?
-Priscilla
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
