I understand the current ambiguity around what the word Chandler
actually means. However, moving forward, all of our marketing
material will try to beat into people's brains that Chandler =
Desktop + Hub + Server... so that we can avoid exactly this kind of
scenario where we end up with a lot of extra copy whenever we need to
refer to things that work for the entire Chandler enchilada.
Pieter? PPD? any thoughts?
On Apr 11, 2007, at 7:57 AM, Brian Moseley wrote:
On 4/11/07, Mimi Yin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm wondering if your sense of that has to do with the fact that
internally, we've always referred to the Desktop as Chandler and the
Server / Web app as Cosmo. Moving forward, I think we want to present
the whole enchilada as Chandler Desktop and Web? I'm leery of having
3 links: Chandler Desktop, Chandler Hub, Chandler Server/Cosmo...but
maybe that's clearest for now.
my concern is just that we avoid making it seem like the url is only
useful for chandler desktop, because that's not true. it's also useful
in the browser for opening the web ui. i don't think "[Chandler]"
adequately describes that duality.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
