On 4/24/07, Mimi Yin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Got it. So shouldn't we just call this a ticket URL? To be consistent with terminology in Chandler as well? Or we should pick a word to describe ticket-URLs and use it in both UIs.
almost any server url can have a ticket in it, whether or not that url addresses a collection's "ticket view", so i don't think the phrase "ticket url" is very useful. +1 for coming up with a more general term.
Mostly, this is the URL you can use without having an account set up, correct?
it's the url you can use to interact with a collection in the web ui without having an account set up. you can't use it for anything else, like subscribing to the collection from an external application. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
