Re-routing Jared's reply to the design list thread.
On May 16, 2007, at 11:17 AM, Jared Rhine wrote:
Mimi Yin wrote:
Perhaps we should have 2 sharing account types that are both MC?
1. for Chandler Hub
2. for Chandler Server
I'm comfortable with that, though it's worth mulling.
Interestingly enough the migration instructions got reduced last
night to only need the "enter user name and password steps".
Some users may want or need to disable SSL when accessing the Hub.
Good point, so we should keep the SSL and Port fields around so
people can futz with them.
I'm also thinking through issues of default-ness, interaction with
settings files, etc. There were a surprising number of caveats and
related issues when we futzed with accounts recently.
What does this mean in concrete terms? How can we be strategic about
changes to the accounts dialog?
+ We wouldn't be changing which account was the default account.
Chandler Hub sharing would still be the default sharing account.
+ We are changing:
- Sign up text
- What the Sign up text links to
- Removing the server and path fields
- Adding a new account type: Chandler Server sharing
Which of these changes do you feel might cause complications with
settings files, default-ness, etc?
Mimi
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
