On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 14:39 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > If we're talking about performance/stability in the context of whether > GNOME 2.12 should use GTK+ 2.8, we're effectively saying "I think the > GTK+ team might ship a unstable or unacceptably slow 2.8.0 release; > GNOME shouldn't commit to using GTK+ 2.8 yet". I would hope that we > would have more confidence in the judgement of the GTK+ team than that.
Crashes and performance are very different types of problem. Crashes get fixed once they can be reproduced. Fixing bad performance can take a long time. Well, I haven't tested gtk2.7 since just after Cairo got added, so I can't tell whether there is a performance problem. Has anybody got numbers? Jon Kåre _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
