On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 23:50 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 14:33 -0400, John (J5) Palmieri wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 14:14 -0400, Luis Villa wrote: > > > Hey, guys- if I wanted to test this: > > > (1) what would I need to do to set it up, exactly? (presume that I > > > have all of GNOME running from source, and can patch as needed.) > > > > You just need to patch gnome-session with Rodrigo's latest patch > > (turning it on with whatever the compile switch is - Rodrigo?) > > > --enable-services > > Also, it would be great if you could test --disable-services to come > back to the old gnome-session, and see if the patch breaks anything. > > > and > > compile libgnomeservice from CVS. > > > and apply the patches (*.patch) that are in libgnomeservice CVS. That > will make some services (nautilus, gnome-volume-manager, metacity, > panel) use the new infrastructure.
I'm not so concerned about this stuff right this second. We are pushing the drop in service file wrapper stuff for 2.12 so that is where I would spend my testing energies. The service framework itself will need massive hammering on before I feel we can even propose it but that is the next stage of our dastardly plan. If we can get things running where session runs fine with the new code and service startup using the wrapper runs great then at that point we can start messing with framework itself, replacing things service by service until we have everything running under the framework. -- John (J5) Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
