On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 15:22 -0400, Luis Villa wrote: > On 7/18/05, Behdad Esfahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Luis Villa wrote: > > > > > build/distribute daily snapshots like we used to. Not sure if that is > > > worth the admitted pain of nagging/etc., especially since ATM no one > > > is offering to build daily snaps. > > > > I'm willing to do daily tinderbox builds with distcheck and all, > > as soon as you check in your hacks (in jhbuild, right?) and I > > don't get a notice from the maintainers of facilities I'll be > > using. > > We're not lacking people doing tinderboxing.[1] The thing we're really > missing (which has always been more important than tinderboxing, IMHO) > is for someone to build daily rpms and debs for popular distributions, > so that 'average' users can use rug, yum, or apt to run CVS HEAD every > day.
What's so difficult about jhbuild? Couldn't we make just make it easier (such as having jhbuild autodetect stuff in /usr and adjust PKG_CONFIG_PATH)?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
