On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 02:54:45PM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote: > <quote who="Rodrigo Moya"> > > > Looking at how to improve gnome-session startup, I found both > > gnome-session and gnome-settings-daemon are starting ESD. > > > > I guess we really want one of them to start it, so which one should be > > removed? My first thought is to remove the one in g-s-d. Is that ok? Or am > > I missing anything? > > I agree - I tend to think g-s-d is managing a bunch of sessiony stuff atm > because they're settings related (esd, xscreensaver, etc). These are > probably best managed as services to the desktop, as part of the session.
We'd need to armor the capplets against a missing session if these move. The capplets ensure that the g-s-d is running. They have no similar requirement enforced for a session. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
