On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 11:54 -0400, Jody Goldberg wrote: > On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 02:54:45PM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote: > > <quote who="Rodrigo Moya"> > > > > > Looking at how to improve gnome-session startup, I found both > > > gnome-session and gnome-settings-daemon are starting ESD. > > > > > > I guess we really want one of them to start it, so which one should be > > > removed? My first thought is to remove the one in g-s-d. Is that ok? Or am > > > I missing anything? > > > > I agree - I tend to think g-s-d is managing a bunch of sessiony stuff atm > > because they're settings related (esd, xscreensaver, etc). These are > > probably best managed as services to the desktop, as part of the session. > > We'd need to armor the capplets against a missing session if these > move. The capplets ensure that the g-s-d is running. They have no > similar requirement enforced for a session.
would calling gnome_sound_connection_get and then only start esd if that fails work? -- Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
