[Dropping the devel-announce-list cc until we have an announcement rather than discussion]
On 11/11/05, Luis Villa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/11/05, Elijah Newren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why a keyword over say the status whiteboard? I don't imagine that > > people will widely search for these after a couple months down the > > road (i.e. when we've cleaned almost all of them out), meaning it > > would just be keyword pollution. > > Point. What would the standard word be to use in the whiteboard? I dunno. Anyone have good suggestions? "critical-warning-crasher" maybe? Also, as an aside, http://bugzilla.gnome.org/reports/boogle.cgi?query="-CRITICAL"; seems to be fairly good at catching these as a first approximation, though the lack of case sensitivity also catches places where people say things like "non-critical". It may be possible to generate a good enough query without manually marking all the relevant bugs. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
