On 11/11/05, Elijah Newren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Dropping the devel-announce-list cc until we have an announcement > rather than discussion] > > On 11/11/05, Luis Villa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/11/05, Elijah Newren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Why a keyword over say the status whiteboard? I don't imagine that > > > people will widely search for these after a couple months down the > > > road (i.e. when we've cleaned almost all of them out), meaning it > > > would just be keyword pollution. > > > > Point. What would the standard word be to use in the whiteboard? > > I dunno. Anyone have good suggestions? "critical-warning-crasher" maybe? > > Also, as an aside, > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/reports/boogle.cgi?query="-CRITICAL"; seems > to be fairly good at catching these as a first approximation, though > the lack of case sensitivity also catches places where people say > things like "non-critical". It may be possible to generate a good > enough query without manually marking all the relevant bugs.
Oh, hrm, good point- I was assuming they'd be unqueryable. Luis _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
