On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 11:54 +0000, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
> I subscribe the good opinion about Gobby, generally, but the security
> of its network protocol leaves a lot to be desired.
Agreed: whilst I'd like to use Gobby, the fact that the data is sent in
plain-text isn't good. Some way of authenticating the servers/peers are
who they say they are (think ssh host key fingerprints), and encrypted
transport streams would be required before I'd use it for work.
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.burtonini.com./
PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list