On 12/5/05, Kjartan Maraas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > man, 05,.12.2005 kl. 18.51 -0500, skrev Luis Villa: > > On 12/5/05, Federico Mena Quintero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > This is a reminder to fix all critical warnings before January 1st. On > > > that day, users of gnome-session HEAD will get G_DEBUG=fatal_criticals > > > turned on automatically. > > > > > > Let's find those bugs and kill them! > > > > link to bugzilla query? > > > Did we agree on a keyword or some whiteboard magic?
No, partially because I'm not sure if we need one. > > I've marked some "critical-warning" (whiteboard) now, but I guess the > easiest way is to just search for "-CRITICAL" in comments. This gave 231 > hits for me. Most of which were due to uses of phrases like "non-critical" (e.g. Owen used that phrase in some of the mass-bug-change thingys). A better search would be G_LOG_LEVEL_CRITICAL, which appears in the stack traces. Would that be good enough, or are there bugs filed about critical warnings that come without stack traces or that are missing this word? If we can use that, and we can use the fulltext search in bugzilla-newer (which is waaay faster than searching comments in current bugzilla), then this'll be fairly quick. I only get 6 bugs with such a query. Unfortunately, giving you the url right now wouldn't help a whole lot since (a) it will change soon as bugzilla-newer is under construction, and (b) bugzilla-newer only has an old snapshot of the database anyway. Can you wait a couple weeks for the link to the bugzilla query? Cheers, Elijah _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
