Le mercredi 18 janvier 2006 à 00:22 +1100, Jeff Waugh a écrit : > <quote who="Frederic Crozat"> > > > Le mardi 17 janvier 2006 à 10:48 +0100, Andy Wingo a écrit : > > > Hi Vincent, > > > > > > On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 22:42 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: > > > > Well, the question is: is GStreamer 0.8 totally unmaintained? > > > > > > Yup. > > > > Thanks for all the people running deployed software running Gstreamer 0.8 > > :( > > Is GNOME 2.10 maintained?
If you want to do an analogy, you should ask : is GNOME 2.12 maintained ? ;) Moreover, most bug fixes from 2.12 can be backported to 2.10 when relevant. After discussing on irc, it seems not everybody has the same definition of "unmaintained". For me, unmaintained means "dead", ie no more commit on CVS, nothing. For Christian (and probably other), unmaintained means "not doing real works on it". -- Frederic Crozat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mandriva _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
