On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 11:52 -0500, Mike Kestner wrote: > On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 18:32 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > > > These optional builds don't help much, unless people are using gentoo > > (or other source-based distros). > > > > If the binary package was built with glade support then distros are > > unlikely to change their binary package in the future to remove the > > glade support. That would be an ABI break. > > Seems like you're just being argumentative, now. > > Is the goal here to reinvent Gtk# in Gtkmm's image, or to satisfy the > requirements of the release set? Last time I checked, libglade was a > platform library.
I do not understand you (or your colleagues) always need to be so aggressive and insulting every time this is discussed. What part of my email made you feel that was necessary? -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
