Tristan Van Berkom wrote: > Vincent Untz wrote: >> Le vendredi 29 septembre 2006, à 22:46, Tristan Van Berkom a écrit : >> >>> to say "do we want glade as part of some gnome module set" ? any ideas >>> on that ? >> Straight question: if we integrate an interface builder in GNOME, how >> can we choose between glade, gazpacho and stetic? >> > > I guess a reply on my behalf is called for here ;-) > > A few points I guess I'll raise in the favor of Glade; > > o Support for all widgets in gtk+ including depricated ones
Depends on what supported means; GtkTreeView, GtkIconView & friends are not really supported by glade. Nor by Gazpacho, Stetic or anything else... Johan _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list