<quote who="Jamie McCracken"> > As this stage I am simply proposing tracker-search-tool as a replacement > for the gnome-search-tool as I believe it does a better job with faster > instant search and search snippets.
That was not entirely clear from previous emails in this thread. In that case, please explain *what* t-s-t is, what t-s-t *does* and *why* t-s-t is so important that we should replace working code with it. Those are the things people need to know, not that you believe it does a better, faster, fitter, healthier, more productive job. > It would be fantastic for Gnome 2.18 to have this around the time Vista > ships and with a common dbus interface for indexing, Beagle too can > benefit by effectively being in too for those that want more indexing than > tracker currently provides (I dont plan on indexing as much as Beagle or > maybe Strigi so there is bound to be room for them too). So, if Tracker doesn't do indexing as a priority, and doesn't cover similar ground to Beagle, why are you positioning it as a choice? Why don't we just use Beagle, which has already shipped with various distributions? - Jeff -- linux.conf.au 2007: Sydney, Australia http://lca2007.linux.org.au/ "Love never misses the chance to put the boot in." - Kelly, SLOU _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
