On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Jamie McCracken wrote: > Hubert Figuiere wrote: > > [ cross-post reduced d-d-l ] > > > > Jamie McCracken wrote:
> >> Some people might not like that but I think its a practical compromise. > >> With tracker being the only one written in pure C it is therefore the > >> only one that can *ultimately* get into the Gnome platform and be fully > >> integrated (at the moment I am just proposing it for desktop which is > >> just a simple blessing nothing more). What are the chances of a version of Beagle ever using the C Lucene backend, which as Jos has mentioned is currently faster? Has the C# Lucene diverged too far away from C Lucene? I have long wondered why C# Lucene was developed in the full knowledge that C Lucene would be preferable to Gnome and now finally seems like an appropriate time to ask. -- Alan _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
