CCing in the dbus list.. Richard Hughes wrote: > On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 10:27 +0000, Rob Taylor wrote: >> This raises an interesting point - how can we get dbus-glib to the >> usablilty it should be? I could make it ABI stable right now, if >> needed, >> but there's still an awful lot that should change, especially in terms >> of being able to demarshal into types of the users choosing. Maybe we >> could make the next dbus-glib a 1.0 release with proper shlib >> versioning, and branch for a 2.0 version which makes it more usable. > > Yes. I use dbus-glib *lots* with gnome-power-manager. If it breaks API, > well, that leaves me in a sticky situation with regard to GNOME > releases. > > I vote fork off dbus-glib 1.0 fairly soon, and start new development in > 1.1.
I'm in favour of doing this, of course making 1.1 parallel installable with 1.0. There are still some pretty major bugs in doing peer-to-peer buses, but I think that would be manageable without changing api, *possibly* adding a bit of api. Any objections? Thanks, Rob Taylor _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
