On 15/02/07, Alexander Larsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 15:52 +0000, Rob Taylor wrote: > > Can anyone with a bit more library maintenance experience give me some > > advice on the best way forward? I don't want to just ignore the ABI > > issue, given the rapidly growing number of components depending on > > dbus-glib. Is the best thing to try and maintain ABI going forwards and > > deprecating symbols as needed? I'll also take a look at the main library > > users, if they're just using the mainloop integration perhaps > > Alexander's suggestion of splitting off a static library with just the > > mainloop integration would be a sensible option. > > Note that such a static library would have to be built with -fPIC so > that shared libs can link to it.
Would we run into a problem if an application used two libraries that had linked this glib mainloop integration static library? James. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
