Le mardi 11 septembre 2007 à 22:37 +0200, Soeren Sandmann a écrit : > This is true. There are issues with git, most importantly that it was > written by someone for whom usability is not, um, a core competence, > but is has a couple of killer features over CVS/SVN: > > * The abilty to commit offline
You can already do it with svk or git-svn. > * Bisect, as Behdad says This is definitely a killer feature, but there is no design limitation preventing implementation of such a feature in subversion. A working svn-bisect script would definitely be a worthwhile contribution. > There are also a couple of non-killer improvements: > > * Performance: git is consistently fast; svn is slow. It should be noted this is only the case for git, not for other DSCMs. Furthermore, svk also noticeably improves performance on svn repositories. As several people already stated, most of git's improvements are already available to those who love git thanks to git-svn. It strikes me that we would actually lose svn's killer feature (simplicity) if the whole repository is migrated to git. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
