On 9/12/07, Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Agreed. > > What is so bad with keeping svn as the master repository (easy to use, > fast enough, very popular) and if people want to use git or bzr for > dvcs, then they use git-svn or bzr-svn? Many people can use those to > branch a svn repository and then merge between themselves, so there is > no hard requirement for a central repository.
I might slightly agree on this, but at the same time disagree, this definitely will work and doesn't require any change to the current situation, what I don't agree about is that you are using only 10% of what DRCS bring by doing this, what I mean is that if GNOME moves to a DRCS, it will require setting up an infrastructure that makes working with DRCS even better, for example a branch viewer, a publish/subscribe infrastructure that helps keeping track of the interesting branches.... Maybe the best approach is to keep svn as you suggest, but at the same time lay down a DRCS infrastructure that will improve the current GNOME project workflow while not requiring any deep surgery :) -- Cheers, Ali http://asabil.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
