On 9/14/07, Alexander Larsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 21:39 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > > > I think one of 2 things: > > 1. Because /cvs/gnome was a repos, and /svn is not. E.g., under CVS, you > > couldn't (IIRC) create something under /cvs, but you could under SVN. > > 2. CVS was smart enough to create the repos > > > > If you check svn help import you see: > > import: Commit an unversioned file or tree into the repository. > > > > "into the repository" ... it isn't smart enough to create the repos > > > > e.g., see the error message: > > svn: No repository found in 'svn+ssh://svn.gnome.org/svn/foobar' > > > > > > This is why I proposed testingground.. if that would exist, you could > > create a repos there. However, later on, you want to move that into a > > real repos. IMO that might be nice on short term, not on long term > > (needs to be a real repos, dump&load work, etc). > > Does this work though? I mean, if testingground is a single module, is > it really possible to extract the version history for a single > subdirectory and create a new svn module from that?
Yes, using a command called "svndumpfilter". You'd have to not care about your revision numbers being resequenced. Sandy _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
