It is worth noting that the new release of subversion will support some of its own merge tracking (which would/will be nice).
http://subversion.tigris.org/merge-tracking/ I think the proposal to add git-daemon to www.gnome.org is a good idea, no weather the best move is to immediately use git in this capacity or to examine the possibility of using one of the other DSCM's (see http://live.gnome.org/DistributedSCM for the evolving discussion of advantages/disadvantages) I'm more or less impartial on this point, however, I do think its something that should be considered, as whichever we choose for this private hosting will invariably become the immediate frontrunner for the eventual migration. On 9/14/07, Hubert Figuiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 20:21 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 05:36:36AM -0700, Sanford Armstrong wrote: > > > Yes, using a command called "svndumpfilter". You'd have to not care > > > about your revision numbers being resequenced. > > > > People care about that? > > > > I always renumber them. However, by default it doesn't. > > When using svnmerge, it stores the revision # already merged. That would > break it if the revision are renumbered. > > Just my $0.02. > > Hub > > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > -- Cheers, Kevin Kubasik http://kubasik.net/blog _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
