On Jan 9, 2008 5:51 PM, David Zeuthen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 18:45 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 00:34 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: > > > > > Retracted: > > > PolicyKit & PolicyKit-gnome (external dependency) > > I kinda dislike the wording here. I didn't retract anything. What did > happen was that several members of the release team pointed out to me > that it was just an external dependency and thus didn't need to be > proposed.
Clarification: ...that it was an external dependency *which no one plans to have a hard dependency on*. Huge difference. > > Eeep. Do you think we can/should push intlclock into > > gnome-panel/applets/clock for 2.22? If so, we'll need PolicyKit (not > > PK-gnome as far as I can tell). > > It should use PolicyKit-gnome (for code reuse etc.) and as far as I > understand it's fine for it to do so. Both PK and PK-gnome are blessed > external dependencies. ?? Blessed as far as gnome releases goes means allowed as a hard dependency for modules. PK and PK-gnome are not blessed external dependencies because you said that no hard dependencies were needed at this time. (I'd give my +1 for blessing them now if we need it, it just was assumed that we didn't need to discuss it.) _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list