Am Mittwoch, den 09.01.2008, 18:10 -0700 schrieb Elijah Newren: > On Jan 9, 2008 5:51 PM, David Zeuthen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > PolicyKit & PolicyKit-gnome (external dependency) > > > > several members of the release team pointed out to me that it was > just an external dependency and thus didn't need to be proposed. > > Blessed as far as gnome releases goes means allowed as a hard > dependency for modules. PK and PK-gnome are not blessed external > dependencies because you said that no hard dependencies were needed at > this time. > > (I'd give my +1 for blessing them now if we need it, it just was > assumed that we didn't need to discuss it.)
i can only mention for another time that policykit-gnome currently has a hard dependency on libsexy[1]. for several times in the past, the release-team has proposed to integrate libsexy in an already existing library like GTK+, and it was mentioned again in vuntz' original module decisions email. so i will not bless it. an optional dependency of policykit-gnome on libsexy should not be a problem. andre [1] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2007-December/msg00225.html [2] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2007-December/msg00227.html -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | failed http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
