On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:13:45PM +0200, Lucas Rocha wrote: > I agree. We shouldn'd discard the possibility of either postponing the > gvfs-based Nautilus or delaying the .0 release if needed. Obviously, > releasing Nautilus with too many or some big regressions is not a good > plan.
More for release-team to decide, not d-d-l. Devs should code. > Personally, I'm more in favor of postponing the gvfs-based Nautilus > because delaying our release can bring more problems for us and for > the projects relying on our schedule. Postponing nautilus means postponing everything. > Hence, it would be good: > - to have a plan with the list of regressions we can't accept for 2.22 That is the showstopper list by Andre. > - to hear (mainly) from Alex if this plan is feasible Just need more development work on missing features. -- Regards, Olav _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
