On Feb 12, 2008 9:24 AM, Olav Vitters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:13:45PM +0200, Lucas Rocha wrote: > > I agree. We shouldn'd discard the possibility of either postponing the > > gvfs-based Nautilus or delaying the .0 release if needed. Obviously, > > releasing Nautilus with too many or some big regressions is not a good > > plan. > > More for release-team to decide, not d-d-l. Devs should code.
Bzzt. Also wrong answer. r-t's role is in large part to reflect the will of devs, so devs should definitely be discussing how to prioritize and deal with this problem. Luis _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
