Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Currently there are 22 files which either have or should have my/Gossip >> copyright information in libempathy alone. There are 43 source files. So >> half of libempathy is not copyright to you to re-license.
Actually, I recounted the files and "22" is slightly incorrect since I included ALL the files missing licensing information. > So you are basically saying "I'm -1 because of relicensing problems > that I'm causing myself?" Yes, effectively. As for "relicensing problems that I'm causing myself", I am FULLY at liberty to do this. It is/was my free time, my decision to use this license and my decision to maintain this license for *my contributions*. It is not ultimately down to just me either, I did not write this project completely on my own remember. I am merely pointing out where licensing is currently incorrectly stated (which others asked for in this thread) and also that the problem is not JUST about relicensing libempathy-gtk, but also libempathy. > Please point the rest of us to the > discussion where Imendio/Gossip staff gives their reasons against > LGPL. Google is your friend :) This was partly discussed on IRC with Xavier IIRC and also covered here: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2007-September/msg00554.html -- Regards, Martyn _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
