Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 27.03.2008, 07:17 -0700 schrieb Ethan Osten: > On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 11:39 +0000, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote: > > Saying "Missing password security" is just being factual, albeit > > syntetic. "And absolute no-go in the current shape" is just pointing > > out that lack of security is a feature that, in his opinion, should > > block inclusion in the desktop. [ I agree with this view, BTW, but that > > is beside the point ]. > "And absolute no-go in the current shape" does *not* necessarily mean > "that password security issue is the most important thing. The "and" > implies independence from the previous sentence, else it would be "This > makes it..." and so on. With the conjunction in place, it logically > reads as an independent reason against Empathy.
Thanks for being so pedantic. The "And" actually is a typo supposed to be "An". You're doing a good job in keeping this running on a personal, non fact-based level. Regards, Sven _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
