On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 09:40 -0700, Luis Villa wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> motivating reason for rejection, also... most of the apps we ship are > >>> mostly useless to most of our users. > >> > >> Do you think so ? It may be I almost perfectly matched GNOME apps > >> till today :) > > > > Looking in Utilities: I rarely use Calculator, Character map, or Disk > > Usage Analyser. You don't see me advocating they be dropped :) > > I'll go ahead and advocate dropping them, if it'll help ;) > > This is exactly the kind of app that makes me think we should have > certification for non-core applications- a way to say 'this is great > and useful and GNOME-y' (which it is) without saying 'this a part of > the core of GNOME which is tied to our release cycle and QA > standards.' > that would probably be fixed if we had the Desktop release splitted into core (panel/applets, nautilus, control center, metacity, ...) and applications -- Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
