On 7/30/08, Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 12:00 -0400, Willie Walker wrote: > > Hi All: > > > > I recently had a nice discussion with the release team about the > > viability of enabling accessibility (i.e., the AT-SPI infrastructure) > > by > > default for GNOME. As a result of that discussion, I'm approaching > > the > > broader GNOME community with a proposal to do this. :-) > > > I'd agree if you can show that there's little to no performance hit from > enabling it. I'd go even further and say that we should not make it > possible to disable it within the UI if you can show that it won't have > adverse effects on most users (that don't need a11y...). >
I have froze my whole session by getting the at-spi stuff to crash. More concrete examples include eog not loading images anymore after crashing at. And I gotta say my crashes were random, happened in 2.20, 2.22. Last time I asked, I was told that the a11y support was really evil regarding crashes because of limitations of orbit/bonobo/something. I'm against as long as it's not crash free, guaranteed. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
