Le mardi 05 août 2008, à 17:01 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki a écrit : > On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Frederic Crozat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > When reviewing hamster license, we discover some inconsistencies : > > - project webpage states LGPL > > - tarball contains GPLv2 > > - some files mentions GPLv3 or later. > > Sorry for the confusion. It seems Toms forgot to replace COPYING with > GPL3. The whole thing is GPL3+ (bundled egg library for key binding is > LGPL). > > Vincent: should we re-release a 2.23.6.1 tarball with GPL3 in COPYING > now? I think the file headers are clear enough about the license.
I don't think it's needed to release a new tarball for that. Clarification here should be enough for most people, and there'll be a new tarball in two weeks anyway. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
