On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 17:27 +0000, Mark Doffman wrote:
> When moving to D-Bus AT-SPI how amenable are people to killing the Cspi
> library? (This is a nasty one. It would require major changes to GOK)
Not volunteering of course ;-) but wouldn't it make more sense to work
out what proportion of the cspi API is actually used by anyone [ gok ?
dasher ? ].
My limited objdump -T grepping skill shows:
SPI_ methods Accessible* methods
dasher 5 9
mousetweaks 7 22
gok 15 78
libcspi 29 230
So - a compat libcspi that makes dasher & mousetweaks happy should be
~trivial, for gok it would be more work; but fairly do-able [ though I'm
not volunteering ;-], and I guess we can throw much of the rest of
libcspi out without over-many qualms [ or are there other apps using
that ? ;-]
Of course, the cspi port is also extremely mechanical work, potentially
even script-able to some degree ;-)
> When moving to D-Bus AT-SPI how amenable are people to deprecating Cspi?
Sounds good to me; there is presumably a new / native GObject-like C
binding that you're creating & exposing via python ?
HTH,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
