On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 16:58 -0400, Martin Meyer wrote: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Xavier Bestel <xavier.bes...@free.fr> wrote: > > Le jeudi 02 avril 2009 à 19:39 +0100, Rob Taylor a écrit : > >> My question would be is why do these "People" have a desktop in which > >> there isn't a DBus session bus? Its been there for a very long time now > >> in most distros, afact. For gnome 3.0, running without a session bus is > >> going to be like running gnome 2.0 without orbit2. i.e. it ain't gonna > >> work right. > > > > How about running application remotely through ssh -Y ? I do it daily, > > and I really hate when it feils because of dbus (but I must confess > > lately things got better, like if apps autostart dbus or something). > > > > (sorry to divert to a slightly different topic, but since we're all on > the gnome-3.0 wagon today...) > On a similar note, how will gtk's client-side windows affect > performance of remote X windows, if at all? Does anyone have any > thoughts or prediction on that?
I haven't done any measurements, but my guess it will have no effect at all. We're still drawing in the xserver. Its just the window positions and sizes that are client side. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list