Ryan Lortie schrieb: > Hi > > Havoc Pennington wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Vincent Untz <vu...@gnome.org> wrote: >>> Schemas are nice, IMHO, so it'd be nice to have people (not necessarily >>> you) explore this problem space ;-) >> >> s/nice/essential/ > > It is true that dconf has no schemas, and I don't want for it to have > schemas. GSettings contains schemas. These schemas are considered to > be part of the application (in the same sense that you would consider a > GtkBuilder file, for example) and therefore do not appear in any way in > the underlying settings database (that's dconf). > > Don't worry -- I'm not totally insane :) > > Cheers
There is a project GConfCleaner somewhere out there that scans gconf and offers to purge all keys not associated with a schema - quite dangerous as there are many apps unfortunately that do not install a schema. Because of that I would even like to see schema being enforced. Thats one way to keep the database size under control. Database size might matter less on the desktop, but I am thinking about mobile devices here and there is does for sure. Or do you have some different idea to detect unused keys (maybe atime, mtime and ctieme attributes)? Stefan _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list