Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 23:06 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
2009/10/13 Rodrigo Moya <[email protected]>:
Ryan is a bit sad to not get feedback on his proposal, so a bit more
seriously: I think what we probably need is a migration plan. Should we
move all the code from gconf to dconf in one cycle (if possible)? Should
apps implement migration for the data in gconf? etc.
I think it makes sense to do the migration for all the apps at once.
Are we speking about:
a) all GNOME Desktop applications
b) all applications hosted on git.gnome.org
c) all GNOME/GTK+ apps using GConf :)
??
Serius: what's the plan for thirdy part applications?
if dconf listens to changes in gconf, 3rd party apps would just need to
link to glib/GSettings instead of libgconf, and their migration would be
done automatically, right?
If dconf listens to changes in gconf, does not 3rd party apps would just
work?
This is a question of run-time interoperability, is dconf inter operate
with gconf clients?
Please clarify this. I can see lots of reasons why 3rd party doesn't
want to re-link to glib/GSettings :)
-Ghee
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
