On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Ryan Lortie <de...@desrt.ca> wrote: > On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 14:00 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: >> if dconf listens to changes in gconf, 3rd party apps would just need to >> link to glib/GSettings instead of libgconf, and their migration would be >> done automatically, right? > > dconf won't be made to listen to GConf. One alternative, though, is > that a GSettings backend could be written that uses GConf (and its > existing database) instead of dconf. This would allow applications to > use the new API to access their existing settings in the existing > database. > > dconf could be brought in later.
That doesn't fix anything; it just delays an identical migration. Sandy _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list