On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 17:31 +0200, Xavier Claessens wrote: > Le 12/06/10 14:49, Bastien Nocera a écrit : > > On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 18:36 +0200, Xavier Claessens wrote: > >> Le 10/06/10 13:27, Richard Hughes a écrit : > >>> On 10 June 2010 12:24, Andre Klapper<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> This requires module maintainers to port their modules now (if you don't > >>>> want an angry release-team mob soon in front of your house). > >>> > >>> So, should we be requesting gtk3>= 2.90 in configure.ac now? At least > >>> for Fedora rawhide the lack of gtk-engines makes all the gtk3-using > >>> application look fugly. > >> > >> To make Empathy build with gtk3 we need: > >> > >> - libcanberra-gtk-3 > >> - libchamplain-gtk-3 > >> - libclutter-gtk-3 > >> - libunique-3 (or drop gtk2 compatibility and use GtkApplication) > > > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=618473 > > > > Emmanuele could do a release. > > > >> - libwebkit-3 > >> > >> Once they are all released and parallel installable (we would like to > >> not lose gtk2 compatibility), we are ready to make the move :-) > > > > Why is losing GTK2 compatibility a problem? It shouldn't matter. You > > could create a gnome-2-32 branch and make changes there if you wanted. > > Ubuntu told me that Maverick (the next ubuntu release) is not going to > ship GTK3, and if we can't build Empathy with GTK2 then they'll just > keep Empathy 2.30.x... tbh I think that's a bad decision from Ubuntu, > but it would be really sad to not ship the latest empathy...
And you're telling me that your decision on keeping a GTK+ 2.x version is based on one distributor's dubious decision? GNOME 3.x will be based on GTK+ 3.x. > But I guess if the whole GNOME 2.32 depends on GTK3 then they'll change > their mind. I know that all my modules will. Cheers _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
