Le mardi 15 juin 2010 à 07:20 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit : > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Josselin Mouette <[email protected]> wrote: > > Le lundi 14 juin 2010 à 23:17 +0200, Andy Wingo a écrit : > >> People can do what they like of course, and I recall back when GStreamer > >> used to compile against GTK+ 1.2 or the GObject in 2.0. But from a bug > >> management perspective, having to always ask what GTK+ a user has > >> compiled against is complicated, and they might not always know if the > >> dependency tree is deep -- and in just such a case, a maintainer will > >> sometimes find that the user inadvertantly linked against 2.x /and/ 3.x > >> (due to transitive dependencies). > > > > Which will seriously break unless people are willing to add versioned > > symbols to GTK+. > > You can keep repeating that over and over. That does not make true. > Symbol versions will not differentiate types, signals, etc over abi > boundaries.
This is completely irrelevant, since the pieces built against one version will use the appropriate types, signals, etc. with the functions of the GTK+ version they are built against. Do you really think GTK+ is the first library with which we encounter such an issue? -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you eat pasta without sauce, it is nothing `- short of communism.” -- Marie _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
