Two questions: 1) Where is it defined what format the path is supposed to be in? 2) What about migration of settings from the old path to the new path?
--Robert On 25 March 2011 09:41, Luca Ferretti <[email protected]> wrote: > Flash news from release team to our all brave developers. > > A member of release team known as *cough*Luca Ferretti*cough* was sure > gsettings PATHs and gsettings IDs were the same, so he was also sure all > GNOME 3 core apps were using the proper path. So he never sent any > notice or filed bug report... > > But we don't want to blame his errors, we want to have a fine tuned > GNOME 3 Desktop. A quick grep[1] shows about 15 basic modules using the > wrong PATH. Patches are available here[2][3]. > > No string changes, no code changes, no UI changes (except paths showed > in dconf-editor, but this is totally undocumented by now), and hard code > freeze exception yet pre-approved. > > If you have no time to commit, I'll be glad to help you, just ask on irc > (elle.uca) or reply here. > > Next step: do the same on non-core modules, but I suppose we can work on > it during 3.2 timeline. > > Cheers, Luca > > [1] http://paste.ubuntu.com/584321/ > [2] http://people.gnome.org/~lferrett/patch/ > [3] actually it misses a patch for org.gnome.packagekit.gschema.xml > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
