Il giorno ven, 25/03/2011 alle 11.04 +0100, Chris Kühl ha scritto: > I'm definitely for having these all be consistent but I find it more > consistent that all paths be of the format org.gnome.[application > name] and /org/gnome/[application name]. This would mean leaving the > "gnome-" prefix even though it does look redundant. I'd have no > problem conforming to any convention though.
No suggestion/rule by now for this part of path/id, sorry. In my patch I've changed from procman to gnome-system-monitor 'cause procman seems so old and unrelated to current application. Both choices (/org/gnome/gnome-system-monitor vs /org/gnome/system-monitor) have bads and goods; personally I prefer the first one, 'cause you can have several system monitors, but only one /usr/bin/gnome-system-monitor. > Also, as Richard had asked, does this mean we have a freeze exception > to make these changes? I'd be happy to make those changes to > gnome-system-monitor if this is the case. Yes, freeze exception granted, feel free to change :) _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
