On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Luca Ferretti <[email protected]> wrote: > Il giorno ven, 25/03/2011 alle 11.04 +0100, Chris Kühl ha scritto: > >> I'm definitely for having these all be consistent but I find it more >> consistent that all paths be of the format org.gnome.[application >> name] and /org/gnome/[application name]. This would mean leaving the >> "gnome-" prefix even though it does look redundant. I'd have no >> problem conforming to any convention though. > > No suggestion/rule by now for this part of path/id, sorry. In my patch > I've changed from procman to gnome-system-monitor 'cause procman seems > so old and unrelated to current application. > > Both choices (/org/gnome/gnome-system-monitor > vs /org/gnome/system-monitor) have bads and goods; personally I prefer > the first one, 'cause you can have several system monitors, but only > one /usr/bin/gnome-system-monitor. >
Thanks. There is a lot old stuff like that lying around this code. Clean up will be the theme of this next cycle for g-s-m. >> Also, as Richard had asked, does this mean we have a freeze exception >> to make these changes? I'd be happy to make those changes to >> gnome-system-monitor if this is the case. > > Yes, freeze exception granted, feel free to change :) > Committed. Chris _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
