On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 07:24 +1200, John Stowers wrote: > On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 13:42 +0100, Allan Day wrote: > > Dave Neary wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > So, in short, I would like the design team to act like the gnome-utils > > > team. > > > > GNOME design has all the equivalent facilities [1, 2, 3] excluding the > > mailing list. > > > > Again, I agree (and have never disagreed) that we need to do better. The > > only question has been around the appropriateness of a mailing list. > > Does this mean an IRC log/bot is back off the table? > > I would be happy to read such logs not for accountability but because > it allows one to learn how the design process operates (like how reading > code can be useful as a programmer). It can also be more convenient for > people in stupid timezones (me). > yesterday I asked the same question (where to follow design discussions, apart from IRC), and I was told to monitor https://live.gnome.org/Design and children pages, which is enough to get a peak of what they are doing indeed.
Also, while I'm not a designer, yesterday I wanted to propose some new stuff, and it was easy to get the design team to find a solution for proposals (https://live.gnome.org/Design/Proposals ), so from my (short) experience they seem to be open to listen to new ideas. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
