On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Olav Vitters <o...@vitters.nl> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 01:09:18AM +0200, Mark wrote: > > Some facts. > > 1. Gnome wants feedback but any feedback gathered online is "non > > representative". It has to be gathered from a "non biased" site like > > cnn.com-_- guess the person who said that lives in a dream world or > > under a stone > > False > false > > > 2. Gnome gets feedback on _gnome's_own_list_of_questions_ but it's "non > > representative" ... > > False > false > > > 3. It's "useless" > > False > false > > > 4. Feedback should be looked for just by asking people, not on internet. > > False > and false > > > This has been extensively explained by lots of people before. Either > read up on what has been said before, or expect to be moderated. If you > want to participate, please at least read up on what was said before. > Just repeating your own beliefs and saying there facts is going to get > you nowhere. > You are false in all false points. The points are all from messages in this thread so i recommend you to read back on the list since you obviously missed something. And i'm not trying to participate. I'm not part of gnome (anymore). All i try to do is lay out the facts and let gnome realize what they see as a "valid" survey is not possible. It would be in a perfect world but that isn't the case. You threatening with moderation is really below the belt. I try to be objective, state facts, be to the point and let gnome realize how realistic their view of feedback is. I didn't insult anyone in person. > -- > Regards, > Olav > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list >
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
