On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 10:22 -0500, Ryan Lortie wrote: > On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 08:59 -0600, Ted Gould wrote: > > I think that this would be more apparent if the DBus interface > > descriptions were maintained outside of the systemd codebase. > > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/timedated > > I won't comment on if you accept this as being sufficiently divorced > from systemd or not...
From the wiki page:
systemd 30 and newer include systemd-timedated
I would conclude that any dependency on that interface is a dependency
on systemd version 30 or newer. Therefore, GNOME has that as a
dependency in 3.4 on systemd > 30.
To be clear, I don't think that's a problem in how the page is written,
I think that's a reality of where the interface is defined.
--Ted
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
