On Fri, 20.01.12 09:39, Ted Gould ([email protected]) wrote: > On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 10:22 -0500, Ryan Lortie wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 08:59 -0600, Ted Gould wrote: > > > I think that this would be more apparent if the DBus interface > > > descriptions were maintained outside of the systemd codebase. > > > > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/timedated > > > > I won't comment on if you accept this as being sufficiently divorced > > from systemd or not... > > From the wiki page: > > systemd 30 and newer include systemd-timedated > > I would conclude that any dependency on that interface is a dependency > on systemd version 30 or newer. Therefore, GNOME has that as a > dependency in 3.4 on systemd > 30. > > To be clear, I don't think that's a problem in how the page is written, > I think that's a reality of where the interface is defined.
Hmm, cool. If it's from the systemd project it must be evil? I totally see that, thank you. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
