On 02/19/2012 03:41 PM, Shaun McCance wrote: > On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 12:48 +0100, Stefan Sauer wrote: >> Just one thought. If people work on a next generation doc tool to take >> over from gtk-doc, please consider to do it without docbook xml at >> all. >> Just go from an intermediate representation to html *without* xslt. >> libxslt is literally dead and other processors are even slower. > libxslt is not slow. The XSLT stylesheets that gtk-doc uses are slow. > It's true that it's not really actively developed, but it's basically > complete as an XSLT 1.0 processor and doesn't need to be constantly > changed. Yes, you are partially right. But its both. For once libxslt is single threaded (also on chunked output).
Just saying, that it might be a good occation to get rid of xslt processing. Stefan > -- > Shaun > > > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
