On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Owen Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 23:39 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > >> I don't want people to draw the conclusion that because I'm saying that >> input methods should have simple configuration without a lot of options, >> I think that they aren't important. I'm very aware that every single >> user that comes to GNOME and wants to write in Chinese needs to use an >> input method. But if we have so many options that the defaults don't get >> well tested, or if options conflict and produce bugs, then we're not >> shipping a good ';';''''''' > > [ I'm sorry - had an input problem here - but attributable to a crumb in > my keyboard rather than anything to do with input methods:-) ] > > then we're not shipping a good product. The configuration should be as > complex as it needs to be but no more.
Sorry for my later mail, I didn't catch up this. > > I don't think there are easy answers, because there are a lot of people > out there who really want to make input work well and work well with > GNOME. So, mostly what I can do here is try to explain a bit about > the way we usually think about things in GNOME and what we consider > successful UI. > > - Owen > > As long as we put our point to UI part, that may not be my expert field. :) I think you guys know this part better than me. But actually I hope there is some possibility for other developer to work on theirs gnome integration. Since some code in gnome-settings-daemon branch seems will be going to shutdown the door for them even if they want. (I mean, without patch) _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
